Behavioral approach by David Easton emphasizes upon scientific methodology to the study of 'Politics'. Give your arguments.
Can politics be studied scientifically?
This debate
All debatesAsked beforeQuestions (3)PositionsSame themeDoes Montesquieu deserve to be called the 'Aristotle of the eighteenth century'?Is Machiavelli a thinker for all ages or a product of Renaissance Italy?Did Aristotle break from Plato or build on him?Asked before
- 00
- 01
- 02
- 03
- 04
- 05
- 06
- 07
- 08
- 09
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
Examiners want: definition, the behavioural claim to scientific method, limits of systematic study, both sides, a verdict on how scientific the discipline is
The questions
Define Political Science. To what extent can one be systematic in a study of Political process? How "Scientific" is Political Science?
Define political science. To what extent can one be systematic in a study of the political process? How “Scientific” is political science?
Positions and chains
No argument map yet; the top 20 debates have theirs. You can still outline any question below.
News about this debate watches for: behaviouralism, david easton, post-behaviouralism, positivism, political methodology, quantitative political science, election forecasting, opinion polling, american political science association, systems analysis.