2014
Elucidate the reasons of constitutional crises in Pakistan after its inception. Also examine the role of Civil-Military stake-holders in lingering the constitution making process during the first decade of political history of Pakistan.
(20)
Debate #161 · Civil–military relations
Did military-backed constitutional engineering cause Pakistan's recurring constitutional crises?
This debate
All debatesAsked beforeQuestions (3)PositionsSame themeDo military takeovers stem from civilian failure or military institutional ambition?Has the military's political role undermined democracy and civilian institutions in Pakistan?Is civilian supremacy over the military achievable in Pakistan?Asked before
- 00
- 01
- 02
- 03
- 04
- 05
- 06
- 07
- 08
- 09
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
Examiners want: Constitution-making delays, civil and military stakeholders' roles, centralisation under 1962 constitution, post-1999 issues, causal assessment, lessons
The questions
2003
Ayub Khan's 1962 constitution was highly centralized and therefore ultimately responsible for creating political turmoil in the country. Discuss.
(20)
2001
Highlight the constitutional issues affecting Pakistan's politics since the army take-over in October 1999.
(20)
Positions and chains
No argument map yet; the top 20 debates have theirs. You can still outline any question below.
News about this debate watches for: 1962 constitution, pco, legal framework order, 17th amendment, doctrine of necessity, supreme court, article 58(2)(b), constituent assembly, basic democracies, ayub khan, musharraf, article 6.