Prep Right
Debate #316 · Economy, growth and trade

Did Pakistan's 1960s growth-first model justify its cost in inequality?

Asked 2 times · 2 years · Economics
This debate All debatesAsked beforeQuestions (2)PositionsSame themeIs IMF lending a debt trap or a path to recovery for Pakistan?Can Pakistan's industrial sector drive growth and absorb its labour force?Should Pakistan shift its tax burden from indirect to direct taxes?
+2 moreAre Pakistan's economic troubles structural or the result of policy failure?State ownership or privatisation: which better serves Pakistan's economy?

Asked before

  1. 00
  2. 01
  3. 02
  4. 03
  5. 04
  6. 05
  7. 06
  8. 07
  9. 08
  10. 09
  11. 10
  12. 11
  13. 12
  14. 13
  15. 14
  16. 15
  17. 16
  18. 17
  19. 18
  20. 19
  21. 20
  22. 21
  23. 22
  24. 23
  25. 24
  26. 25
  27. 26

Examiners want: functional inequality strategy, 22 families, growth-equity trade-off, 1970s paradigm shift, evidence-based verdict

The questions

2003
CSS · Economics · Discuss

"The debate on 'growth and equity' trade-off that ensued in the second half of the 1960s, was largely responsible for the subsequent paradigm shift. However, the economic and social indicators in the 1970s, scarcely justified the latter". Discuss.

(20)
2002
CSS · Economics · Question

The policy of "financial inequality" in the sixties, transformed the economic structure and social order in Pakistan. Substantiate with facts and logical conclusions, whether you agree or otherwise.

give evidencePakistan linkOutline itOpen the paper

Positions and chains

No argument map yet; the top 20 debates have theirs. You can still outline any question below.

News about this debate watches for: ayub khan, 22 families, decade of development, mahbub ul haq, functional inequality, growth and equity, bhutto, harvard advisory group, income inequality, 1960s growth.