Compare and contrast the theories of balanced and unbalanced growth. Which of these do you think better suit a developing country like Pakistan?
Debate #233 · Other · Economics
Does balanced or unbalanced growth better suit Pakistan?
This debate
All debatesAsked beforeQuestions (3)Evidence (1)PositionsSame themeIs deficit-financed public spending justified for Pakistan's development?Does comparative advantage justify free trade over protection?Are Pakistan's worsening terms of trade the result of an unequal relationship with rich nations?Asked before
- 00
- 01
- 02
- 03
- 04
- 05
- 06
- 07
- 08
- 09
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
Examiners want: Nurkse, Rosenstein-Rodan and Hirschman compared, desirability and feasibility for underdeveloped countries, relevance to Pakistan, a reasoned choice
The questions
2021
(20)
2020
What do you mean by the concept of balanced growth? Examine the desirability and capacity of the under-developed countries to follow the balance growth path.
2019
Describe the salient features of Nurkse, Ropan and Hirchman theories. Comment on the relevancy of each with reference to Pakistan?
(20)
Evidence you can cite
Positions and chains
No argument map yet; the top 20 debates have theirs. You can still outline any question below.
News about this debate watches for: balanced growth, unbalanced growth, big push, nurkse, rosenstein-rodan, hirschman, linkages, industrial policy, leading sectors, pakistan industrialisation.