Examiners want: definition of activism, constitutional basis of review, key cases and amendments, impact on parliament and executive, limits, reform path
There has been growth of judicialization of politics and reliance on judiciary for dealing with mega-politics globally as well as in Pakistan. What have been the judiciary specific amendments in the constitution from 1973 to the most recent? Describe how have the same undermined/strengthened the judicial organ?
Judicial activism is the natural corollary of poor governance in Pakistan. Do you agree?
The growing judicial activism in Pakistan is clearly at the expanse of parliamentary sovereignty and supremacy. Critically analyze the statement.
Compare and analyse the role played by Judiciary in Pakistan and discuss future expectations and availability of options in the best interest of the state.
Write a comprehensive note on the power of judicial review and its limits in the context of Pakistan.
What is "Judicial Activism”? Has it brought Pak-Judiciary in the state of morality in the recent past? Give suggestion for the independence of Judiciary. (20)
No argument map yet; the top 20 debates have theirs. You can still outline any question below.
News about this debate watches for: suo motu, article 184(3), 26th amendment, 19th amendment, 18th amendment, supreme court of pakistan, constitutional bench, judicial commission, chief justice, doctrine of necessity, parliamentary sovereignty, judicialization of politics.