Globalization and National Economies.
Is globalisation irreversible, or is nationalist backlash reasserting state control over economies?
This debate
All debatesAsked beforeQuestions (5)Evidence (2)PositionsSame themeHas the United Nations been sidelined as guarantor of international peace and security?Does WTO-led economic globalisation benefit or exploit developing countries like Pakistan?Does international law effectively constrain the conduct of powerful states?Asked before
- 00
- 01
- 02
- 03
- 04
- 05
- 06
- 07
- 08
- 09
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
Examiners want: Globalisation's effect on state autonomy and inequality, rise of populism and anti-globalisation (Brexit, protectionism), state capacity to resist, implications for national economies
The questions
Is Globalization an irreversible process? Do states have the capacity to resist the forces of globalization or their survival and economic benefits require an unconditional submission?
Has nationalism been the most common cause of conflict in the post-Cold War era? Accordingly, point out the reasons for the rise of populism and anti-globalization wave in this regard.
Globalization restrict the autonomy of the state, generates domestic social conflicts, and inequalities. Discuss the interactions between globalization and domestic politics.
Brexit means globalization is the rhetoric of the privileged, and capitalism will return ferociously as ever.
Evidence you can cite
Positions and chains
No argument map yet; the top 20 debates have theirs. You can still outline any question below.
News about this debate watches for: brexit, deglobalisation, protectionism, populism, trade war, tariffs, economic nationalism, supply chains, reshoring, america first, decoupling.