Examiners want: Instrument of Accession, comparison with Junagadh and Hyderabad, consent of the people, India's position against Pakistan's
The so-called 'Instrument of Accession' of Bharat with Kashmir "is fraudulent and impossible to accept" as it is "based on violence". In the light of the Quaid-i-Azan's statement make a comparison and correlation of the State of Jammu and Kashmir with the State of Junagadh, Manavadhar, Mangrol, Sardargarh, Bantva and Hyderabad etc.
The Indian Policy on Kashmir is caught on the horns of a dilemma and that dilemma is that if it accepts the verdict of the people, it has to vacate the territory of state of Junagarh, Manavadhar, Mangrol, Hyderabad etc. Explain.
No argument map yet; the top 20 debates have theirs. You can still outline any question below.
News about this debate watches for: instrument of accession, maharaja hari singh, junagadh, hyderabad, manavadar, indian independence act 1947, plebiscite, unsc resolution 47, operation polo, october 1947.