Prep Right
Debates › World order, UN and great-power politics
Debate #296 · World order, UN and great-power politics

Are globalisation and regionalism antagonistic or complementary forces?

Asked 2 times · 2 years · International Relations · Political Science
This debate All debatesAsked beforeQuestions (2)PositionsSame themeHas the United Nations been sidelined as guarantor of international peace and security?Does WTO-led economic globalisation benefit or exploit developing countries like Pakistan?Is globalisation irreversible, or is nationalist backlash reasserting state control over economies?
+2 moreDoes international law effectively constrain the conduct of powerful states?Does an emerging multipolar order create more opportunity or risk for Pakistan?

Asked before

  1. 00
  2. 01
  3. 02
  4. 03
  5. 04
  6. 05
  7. 06
  8. 07
  9. 08
  10. 09
  11. 10
  12. 11
  13. 12
  14. 13
  15. 14
  16. 15
  17. 16
  18. 17
  19. 18
  20. 19
  21. 20
  22. 21
  23. 22
  24. 23
  25. 24
  26. 25
  27. 26

Examiners want: Definitions in brief, regional blocs as adaptation or resistance to globalisation, examples such as EU, ASEAN, SAARC, assessment of the relationship

The questions

2020
CSS · Political Science · Discuss

Discuss the way in which globalization could promote regionalization as an adaptation.

Outline itOpen the paper
(20)
2002
CSS · International Relations · Take a position

“Globalization” and “Regionalism”. Do you think these terms are antagonistic or complementary? Give examples in your arguments.

give evidenceyour positionOutline itOpen the paper
(20)

Positions and chains

No argument map yet; the top 20 debates have theirs. You can still outline any question below.

News about this debate watches for: regionalism, regional integration, european union, asean, saarc, eco, sco, rcep, free trade agreement, regional trade bloc.