New Public Management has been hailed as the dominant paradigm for public service in the last two decades. In your opinion, how viable is NPM for developing countries taking into account the distinct and complex environment of public sector organizations in such countries?
Is New Public Management viable for developing countries like Pakistan?
This debate
All debatesAsked beforeQuestions (4)Evidence (1)PositionsSame themeIs Pakistan's bureaucracy a colonial steel frame or an agent of development?Is Pakistan's governance crisis rooted in weak institutions or in politics?Has Weber's bureaucratic model outlived its usefulness for modern public administration?Asked before
- 00
- 01
- 02
- 03
- 04
- 05
- 06
- 07
- 08
- 09
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
Examiners want: NPM versus bureaucratic model, whether it explains Pakistan's reforms, permanence of reinventing government, and limits in developing-country settings
The questions
Contemporary public administration has been powerfully influenced by the broader governance trends such as public ethics and reinventing government. Evaluate this statement as a permanent feature or only a temporary trend in context of Pakistan?
Compare and contrast the Bureaucratic Model with New Public Management (NPM). Do you think NPM has replaced the bureaucratic approach to public administration? Support your views with examples from Pakistan
What is “New Public Management”? To what extent NPM explains the administrative reforms in Pakistan which have been undertaken in the last few years? Discuss with examples.
Evidence you can cite
Positions and chains
No argument map yet; the top 20 debates have theirs. You can still outline any question below.
News about this debate watches for: new public management, reinventing government, osborne and gaebler, devolution plan 2001, performance management, results-based management, citizen charter, agencification, contracting out, public sector reform.