729,000 accessed climate-resilient learning/skills; 51% girls.
Source
UNICEF — https://www.unicef.org/pakistan/reports/unicef-pakistan-annual-report-2025. Verified in source set / retroactive normalization pending.
What it proves
Climate adaptation, education and gender inclusion can be integrated.
What it does not prove: The 51% girls figure is parity inside a selected intervention cohort, not in the education system, where 25.1m children remain out of school and Balochistan's exclusion rate is ~69%; targeted programmes can engineer gender balance that the national system does not produce. "Accessed" also records entry into learning or skills provision, not completion, certification, or any measured gain in climate resilience.
Memory hook: 729,000, 51% girls → parity engineered inside a programme, not inside the system
Rebuts the claim: "Climate adaptation, schooling and gender equity compete for the same scarce rupee" — a single programme delivered all three to 729,000 people, so the trade-off is a design failure, not a budget law.